Yeah, I’m pretty sure you could do that.

…or, I Get Referrals, from Irvine, California, “deer hunting with a 338 lapua.”

Oh, I’m sure a .338 Lapua would make a FINE deer rifle, with that 200-grain bullet chugging along at 3340 fps or so and 4950 lb-ft. of energy at the muzzle. Compare that to, say, about 2620 lb-ft. for a 168-grain .308 round at about 2650 fps. If anything a .338 might be overkill, unless you’re making routine shots from 1,000 yards-plus. But hey, as the old saying goes, smoke ’em if you got ’em. I’d hunt with it if I could afford the feeding costs. πŸ˜‰


4 Responses to “Yeah, I’m pretty sure you could do that.”

  1. BL Says:

    I shot a deer with a .577 Sunday because I could πŸ™‚

  2. mike w. Says:

    Pfft. Everyone knows that any caliber that doesn’t start with a 4 or higher is for pansy little girls….

  3. southtexaspistolero Says:

    The .577 T-Rex? Damn. Did you have to knock your shoulder back into its socket? Lol

    Mike: Heh. Never thought about that rule applying to long guns. That’ll put that 5.56 vs 7.62 NATO debate to rest right quick!

  4. southtexaspistolero Says:

    Seems like it would be better used for elk,moose, bison, or brown bears. A deer doesn’t need that much firepower, especially the little white tails that are in so many areas.
    Like Reply

    Just shoot ’em right where the head joins the neck and you won’t ruin much meat.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: