Wow, they’re getting more frustrated by the day, it seems.

“Authorized Journalists,” that is (emphasis mine — ed.):

…The logical concept is to separate everyone from their guns. Guns are a dead, obsolete technology.

“But Chadwick, I want my guns to shoot animals!” Wow. Okay, Elmer.

The Democrats need to do what is right in this situation. This is one of those scenarios in American politics where the smartest, most intuitive citizens need to force legislation upon the people, even when it is not the popular choice. The leadership roles that Congress and the President have taken oaths to uphold need to make decisions that are blatantly and obviously the correct ones, which will make for a safer country. A safer country, even when many citizens do not have the intellectual abilities to understand that it is the safest choice for them.

Interesting. I always had an idea that many journalists thought gun owners were stupid, but until now I don’t think I’ve ever seen one of them come right out and say it. I suppose it’s yet another sign that those mooks are on the defensive, and yet more proof that we really do live in two different countries. At any rate, one wonders if our budding “Authorized Journalist” Chadwick Bowman has a clue of the implications of what he’s advocating:

Bill Clinton extended our own rules of war in the Kosovo intervention to include the news media and other propagandists as legitimate targets. Under these rules, Ambassador Dan (or, in this case, Authorized Journalist Chadwick — ed.) and his anti-gun ilk would all be dead men….

The war would not end until one vision of America or the other won. It would be war to the knife and knife to the hilt. The 850,000 traditional Americans would be determined to take as many of the Einsatzgruppen, their commanders and controllers with them as possible. And it would be far greater than a one-to-one ratio. The fanaticism that the liberals have always imputed to us, would in the event, become real and deadly. If Ambassador Dan’s (again, in this case, Authorized Journalist Chadwick’s — ed.) future fascists do win, it will be a Pyrrhic victory that would, for destruction and casualties, dwarf all of America’s wars put together. Which, if you think of it, is a funny way to have a “safe” society….

…Even well-paid federal police bureaucrats just want to live until retirement. How long do you think they would last when team after team of them are shot down like dogs in the street, garroted in their sleep, poisoned in their mess halls, or found with their throats slit in guardposts, restrooms and bordellos?

Come to think of it, though, that’s just the sort of thing these God-forsaken intellectuals would foist upon us. It really is too bad so many of them wouldn’t live to regret it.

(h/t David Codrea and Kurt Hofmann)

(Welcome, visitors from Armed and Safe and Days of Our Trailers! Main page is here, pull up a seat and stay a while!)


2 Responses to “Wow, they’re getting more frustrated by the day, it seems.”

  1. BL Says:

    People that discount threepers are foolish people. They can call whatever names they want but I bet they don’t have storable food, survival skills/tools, and an intense hatred for being told what to do. Nobody wants a war BUTt the least free person in the world is a person that won’t fight a war for his own freedom if need be. That’s what keeps us free, the handful that don’t mind being on the watch lists and speak their minds as a warning to the nanny folk.

    Had an interesting E-Conversation with an author amigo the other week, and we agreed that the people that want to nanny others are generally the least likely to even properly regulate their own behaviors. It’s all a projection of THEIR weakness on others. My arms, both modern and primitive, will never kill another human unless that other human forces me to choose between them and myself. I’m selfish and I’ll pick ME surviving EVERY TIME if it comes up.

  2. Crotalus Says:

    “Guns are a dead, obsolete technology.”

    Oh, I dunno. They still seem most effective at what they do.

    But let’s assume that your (wacked-out) statement is true, Sparky. If that be so, what do you plan to give us in order that we may defend ourselves against criminals and psychos (tyrants included in that spectrum)?

    Wait,what? Nothing?

    Then go screw yourself!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: