Well, not exactly.

I might agree with this comment to this Froma Harrop column:

It certainly seems like the radical environmentalists would rather keep our nation’s soldiers killing and being killed protecting Middle East oil, when the oil can safely come from Canada or the US – requiring no soldier’s protection at all.

…but for the fact that I don’t think the radical environmentalists want that so much as they want everyone to:

A. live in caves and huts and walk everywhere; or,

B. die.

I can’t speak for Froma Harrop, but it’s no big secret that a lot of people are big fans of mass transit and people being taxed (or otherwise coerced) into using it. Just exactly where do they think the fuel for those buses is going to come from?


5 Responses to “Well, not exactly.”

  1. Sabra Morse Onstott Says:

    Compressed natural gas, like I believe the Route 17 runs on.

  2. Albatross Says:

    CNG, though cleaner, is still a fossil fuel.

    • Sabra Morse Onstott Says:

      Very true, but I doubt many folks have thought that far. Most people don’t seem to realize that manufacturing a given “green” product uses resources, after all.

      • Albatross Says:

        True dat. I’ve also heard that recycling certain products takes more energy than manufacturing them anew, so the recycling thereof actually leads to more usage of resources. Paper falls into this category, I believe.

  3. BobG Says:

    I thought all mass transit systems ran on unicorn farts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: