I have an answer to this question.

From the Charlotte Observer:

As the nation revisits gun control following the massacre in Newtown, Conn., the sheriffs embody another facet of the debate: What are we entitled to know, through public records, about our neighbors’ weaponry?

How about not a damned thing? There is absolutely no legitimate point to publishing data about concealed-carry permit holders. Grass Roots North Carolina president Paul Valone was dead on the money:

“What they’re trying to do is shame gun owners…‘Gee, Jim you’ve got a gun permit – you’re not going to go postal on us are you?’ It’s an attempt to stigmatize people.”

That’s really what it’s about. No more, no less. It’s just too bad that Cherokee County sheriff Keith Lovin had to give the newspaper at least some cover for doing it with the alleged abuses at his department that the paper had previously covered.

Notwithstanding that, though, he absolutely did the right thing. I did get a kick out of one of the comments, though:

…if firearm permits are public records, then they’re public records whether some two-bit sheriff likes it or not. Don’t like it? That’s fine; there’s a legislative solution to it, and I’m sure it will be enacted. But in the meantime … do your job.

One wonders if they’d have said the same if this was about, for example, the enforcement of the  laws mandating that black people had to sit at the back of the bus…



2 Responses to “I have an answer to this question.”

  1. Bob S. Says:

    Hmm, HIV is a still a major health issue — maybe those who have gotten blood transfusions or belong to a high risk category should have their information published.

    Of course, given the temperate of the people being a news reporter is a high risk occupation. Maybe all the address, personal information of newspaper employees should be published.

    All law enforcement personnel have a right and more importantly a responsibility to NOT enforce unconstitutional laws.

  2. mick Says:

    I totally agree with you on this one. Creating public documents of the home addresses of people who haven’t committed any crimes, but just disagree with you on a hot button issue is creepy and wrong.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: