If it’s not one thing, it’s another.

…or, Some people are never satisfied:

Being a part of the community is crucial. The darkest thing about the tech buses is that they have turned their backs on communities. They have chosen to construct their own bubbles, their own echo chambers.

In an ideal scenario, these Yahoos and Don’t be evil entities would locate themselves in existing urban communities. Ideally, in blighted ones.

Wow. I mean, just…wow. To twist one of the comments I saw on Facebook, yes, of course, this would make perfect sense. Why? Well, so the community activists wouldn’t have so far to go to protest the tech corporations for their aiding and abetting the gentrification of the community. You thought the Portland Trader Joe’s brouhaha was bad? Yahoo moving to the East Side or Houston’s Third Ward would make that look like a walk in the park. It’s worth asking what the author of that piece thinks of eminent domain and the uses for it that the Supreme Court approved in Kelo v. New London.

And considering this little snippet…

as if raising the rents in formerly affordable districts was not enough, the tech companies are now taking the streets away, too.

…it’s worth asking what the point of the piece was in the first place. After all, you can put the company in that blighted neighborhood and get the employees to take public transportation, but considering they’re probably not going to want to take a two-hour commute each way on the city busses, that puts us right back at “raising the rents in formerly affordable districts.”

This is, of course, assuming they’d want to buy and/or build houses in the surrounding neighborhoods. Depending on where they were, that might work. After all, some of the nicest neighborhoods in the city are abutted by some of the more, shall we say, run-down neighborhoods. But of course, building in the lower-income neighborhoods would likely raise the property values, which puts the squeeze on owners and renters alike.

Would it be possible to make the tech companies part of the community? Sure it would, but at the same time I don’t really see what’d be so wrong with the employees living where they wanted to…

Advertisements

Tags:

One Response to “If it’s not one thing, it’s another.”

  1. 3boxesofbs Says:

    Other than “give us money we didn’t do anything to earn” I can’t figure out these people.

    They want the businesses in the state; tech companies pay great salaries, make good profit often,etc.
    But they don’t want them living any place — leave outside the city and they complain the city is being ripped off and ignored.
    Live in the city and they are taking up good property and making it better — I mean, making former decayed areas ‘gentrified, I mean squeezing the poor people out of affordable housing ….Yeah, that’s the ticket

    I have a really radical idea; why don’t some of the people complaining about tech companies get an education and or sufficient motivation to start their own effing company.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: